https://american-women-chat.cloudtools.nl/ https://american-women-chat.time2surf.nl/ https://american-women-chat.linkupdate.nl/ https://american-women-chat.linkmolen.nl/ https://american-women-chat.vindnu.com/ https://american-women-chat.vindhier.com/ https://american-women-chat.jougids.nl/ https://american-women-chat.koalahilfe.de/ But they better not lose their looks, or the EPA will issue regulations classifying them as polluters. 174 jf12 says: June 6, 2014 at 6:02 pm #173 “I’d argue that it’s not a good path under any circumstance” Me too, including past and/or future relationships with other people. But if you (generic you) having casual sex with *other* people is not off the table for *those* people with whom you are unserious, then since sex is the thing that makes a sexual relationship what it is, then it is the saddest and possibly vilest thing in the world to deprive of sex the person with whom you are trying to have a more serious sexual relationship. 175 deti says: June 6, 2014 at 6:03 pm “Just to be explicit about what I think is going on here, all this tu quoque-ing back & forth between men & women about what we feel we’re “entitled” to is part & parcel of renegotiating the sexual/investment contract between the sexes.” good point, Roe. Of course, a large contingent of the female side of that equation unilaterally decided what she would provide, about, oh, 30 to 40 years or so ago. The male side of that equation is juuuuust now figuring that out; and playing a bit of catchup.